Skip to main content

Film Review: The Wolf of Wall Street

Sex, drugs and stockbroking!

The debauchery antics and lifestyle famed by rock ‘n’ roll legends, we learn, are not limited to the music industry. Instead, those in the financial industry peddling stocks and shares, are shown to also be ‘living the dream’ of money, sex and drugs. Well, that is according to the Martin Scorsese film The Wolf of Wall Street, starting Leonardo DiCaprio, which is based on a memoir by disgraced broker Jordan Belfort (DiCaprio’s character) of the same name.
The film is said to be based on true accounts of the rise and fall of Belfort’s life on Wall Street, which saw him defraud his clients and get rich. If his memoirs are anything like the film, I can definitely see the appeal to have adapted it for the silver screen. Though to be honest, I don’t think much adapting was necessary since his life story seems like something only Hollywood could dream up!
The film is directed in a way that seems to glamorize Belfort’s lifestyle, emphasizing its rich content of money, sex and drugs. With DiCaprio delivering his suave Great Gatsby acting and really bringing both the character and the film to life.

While I can admit that I enjoyed the film's visuals and acting, I did find it hard at times to watch. With all the nudity, sex, drugs and domestic violence not easy to digest, no matter what spin you put on it. The gluttony and opulence of Belfort’s life was impeccably displayed through the film, though, while watching I couldn’t stop thinking whether this highly glamorized narrative of Jordan’s life was authentic to his own expression or was this Hollywood’s doing?

There was no moral to the Jordan’s story, no remorse shown in the film. This was epitomized in the ending scene, where Jordan learns his fear of prison was irrational since prison for rich men isn’t far off from a long stay at the country club. I found this deeply disturbing, and for this reason, I left the cinema feeling empty and slightly guilty for having enjoyed any of it.
The film can be seen to endorse the idea of a certain type of reckless behavior enacted by the people responsible for our present day financial situation.  Though what’s worse is that the film presents this behavior in such a way that condones it as every ‘mans’ dream - money, beautiful women, sex, drugs and the diminished sense of responsibility. This we see is implied regularly in DiCaprio’s first person narration. 

He is living the dream all men really want to be living, and come on, it has to be a male dream since I cannot imagine many women opting to align themselves with the wives of of these stockbrokers, since we see Jordan cheat on, rape and violently attack his second wife. I am sure no woman would consider access to wealth worth these conditions.
So what was the conclusion of the film? Was it ok for Jordan to screw over his clients since he was just trying to live the dream, and you can’t blame him for that? It’s a rich (white) mans world, so you either play the game or sit it out? We see Jordan’s entrepreneurial spirit portrayed in the film as being his redeeming quality, despite the immoral way he achieved his success and wealth. The fact that he achieved it, seemed to be the only thing that really mattered, with it being almost admirable that he was able to find new ways to make money after Wall Street.
I feel Scorsese was being ironic in the making of this film, since the approach seems to mock our indulgence for Hollywood films, giving us everything one expects from a Hollywood production (beautiful women, nudity, sex, drugs, violence, etc.) in a form that is so sickingly sweet one OD’s on its frequent scenes of explicit sex and drug (for a non R rated film).
With the high glamour direction used in a way that is not only ironic, but also parodies our social conditions. Since Scorsese has glamorized the very industry we are still currently blaming for the credit crunch, what the recent Occupy movements protested against, making them an industry of rock stars, and who doesn’t love a rock star?! No scene in the film epitomizes Jordan’s rock star quality better than the Lemmons scene at the country club, who didn’t laugh at that?
I feel that The Wolf of Wall Street was soo wrong that it was right. That in spite of its immaculate cinematic’s one wasn’t meant to wholly enjoy it, that one was meant to feel  uncomfortable at times, that one was meant to question it immoral ending.  Scorsese presents us with a visual representation of contemporary capitalism, one in which everything seems great and 'everyone's a winner (if they try), but at what cost and to what loss?
Are we really that ignorant?
I thought this was perfectly demonstrated in the film, as DiCaprio’s character, on more than one occasion plays on this idea that the audience is too ignorant to understand the technicalities to the plot of his deception. As we won’t understand all that financial jargon, he instead opts for a simple summary to spare our simple minds.


  1. Nope, I wouldn’t recommend the film to anyone. The wolf of wall street is bad. Not because it’s provocative but because it’s disgusting and offensive for no reason. Its misogyny is not an exposure or a critique, it’s a display. The message it pretends to be sending is just an excuse for the provocation that will guarantee some eyeballs, it doesn’t really criticize what it is portraying in any meaningful way nor does it expose how harmful it is to the women surrounding its ahole protagonist, who is the only one that matters and the consequences for him are the only consequences that matter. All that stays with you are the images of women used as objects, like in porn and this guy having a good time until he is not. They simply make sure that the film leaves an impression to boost its oscar chances even if that impression is through meaningless, misogynistic, degrading imagery and language. Bothering to critique or expose the injustice of things must be too much for the dumb audience they assume they have I guess

  2. My question is — is this movie doing anything new? At this point, “white Wall Street conmen experience meteoric rise and disgraceful plummet, as accompanied by prostitutes and drugs; cause us to question our own social values” isn’t new ground to tread. In a year where we had some pretty cool and unusual things happening in mainstream cinema (an animated “princess” movie where the most important relationship was between two sisters, a space thriller whose face was a middle-aged woman, a high-grossing action movie starring a young woman, a sci-fi blockbuster where 2/3 leads were NOT white men, a female buddy-cop movie), this just seems….tired. And honestly, nothing in this review is making me think the movie is going to ask any questions that haven’t been asked a million times, in similar explorations. Pass, sorry.

  3. While you raise a good point, it is telling that the films you have mentioned are all fantasy/sci-fi, where as TWW is said to based on real life. There is absolutely no reason why fictitious narratives cannot be racially and gender diverse, which is why it’s good to see examples like you mentioned appearing on the silver screen.

    Though, our reality is something different to contend with, so when presented with films which are meant to depict our history, what do you what it to say? Personally, I think such films always have an agenda which really only reside into 2 catogories, they either romanticize the past or they make us question it. With TWW, it is way too glamourized and morally defunct to be trying to romanticize this history, which is why I felt it must be trying to be ironic.

    I think it’s positive that you felt so strongly against the storyline, as like I said in the post, I think you were meant to leave the screening feeling discomfort. Until I came up with the post, I felt the same way, I had to overcome my shock and anger, then I could look at the film critically and ask myself what I thought the film was trying to convey? Which is the reason I like to blog. I am in no way attempting to endorse the film, just try to make sense of it, and maybe see how others felt about.

  4. Just got my check for $500.

    Sometimes people don't believe me when I tell them about how much you can earn taking paid surveys online...

    So I took a video of myself getting paid over $500 for doing paid surveys.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Music Review: The Weeknd Trilogy

Rarely do I buy new music these days, with it being even more of a rarity that I buy music from male artists. Reason being that I just can not stomach the lies and hypocrisy commercially viable male solo artists spin with their predictable music and unoriginal public image clashing fiercely with the reality of their private lives.

With music today being so limited in the topics sung about and (in making myself sound old - which I'm not) the lack of experience, soul and true artistry in today's predominately young artists, I was surprised and delight to find out about Canadian singer The Weeknd. I'm told that this artist has actually been around for a while, though it is only now that The Weeknd's music is reaching commercial heights with the song Wicked Games played regularly on the radio. While I have liked the song since hearing it, it wasn't until I had seen its music video that I really became interested in what this young male solo artist has to offer.


Rise Of The Beta Male

Interesting article in last week’s Shortlist discussing the demise of the 'Alpha' male and rise of the 'Beta' male.
In a nutshell, the article was discussing recent culture changes in male behaviour and attitudes which has contributed to the emergence of the Beta male.
Beta males are smart sensitivity men who invest in their appearance, they are said to have turned their backs on the old Alpha male ways of male domination, aggression and exploitation, instead they embody intelligence, charisma and are liberal thinking. According to the article beta males are changing the way we do business!

I was pleased to see that the article had made a connection with this new male attitude and behaviour to the adaption (for the better) to the feminist movement and the study's of masculinity, since the process of women demanding and slowly achieving gender equality has encouraged many men to relieve themselves of the emotional castration once promoted as the alpha male image of…

Dove Labels Skin Tones Fair, Normal and Dark

Tut tut tut at Dove for this, the people that loves every type of skin on every type of body seems to think their is such a thing as normal skin, what that is I would really like to know!
While I can understand that the Dove product is said to heighten one natural skin pigment for a 'Summer Glow' I don't think it appropriate that they labelled the product suitable for 'fair to normal skin' or 'normal to 'dark skin'.

This is wrong on so many levels and could have been avoided had they used the word medium instead of normal. I'm not angry though it does highlight the existence of racism (for anyone in doubt) and also exemplifies how those who hold influental social/cultural/political roles still uphold racist ways of thinking.